From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jenkins

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 15, 1967
424 P.2d 894 (Or. 1967)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 1967

Affirmed March 15, 1967

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

HERBERT M. SCHWAB, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, J., Presiding, and O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and FORT, Justices.


Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.

No offer of proof was made and consequently, even if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Jenkins

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 15, 1967
424 P.2d 894 (Or. 1967)
Case details for

State v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 15, 1967

Citations

424 P.2d 894 (Or. 1967)
424 P.2d 894

Citing Cases

State v. Wonderling

The purpose of this rule is to assure that appellate courts are able to determine whether it was error to…

State v. Walker

In the absence of information from which this court could make a determination that the lack of the…