Summary
affirming suppression order and citing Tillman for the proposition that in order to be preserved for appellate review an argument against suppression must have been presented to the lower court and cannot be presented for the first time on appeal
Summary of this case from State v. FernandezOpinion
No. 3D14–1242.
11-18-2015
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Shawn Michael JAMES, Appellee.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Shayne R. Burnham, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker–Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Shayne R. Burnham, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker–Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”); State v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 399, 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“An argument against suppression may not be presented for the first time on appeal.”).