From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. James

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1891
13 S.E. 112 (N.C. 1891)

Opinion

February Term, 1891.

MOTION of the Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal.

Attorney-General for the State.

R. B. Burke for defendant.


This case was tried at Spring Term, 1890, of ALEXANDER. The appeal was docketed here at Fall Term, 1890. There was no application for certiorari at that term ( Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N.C. 562), and no excuse is shown for the delay. Under the repeated decisions of this Court, we must direct the entry to be made.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Sondley v. Asheville, 110 N.C. 90; Graham v. Edwards, 114 N.C. 230; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 279; Norwood v. Pratt, 124 N.C. 747; Benedict v. Jones, 131 N.C. 475; Mirror Co. v. Casualty Co., 157 N.C. 30; McLean v. McDonald, 175 N.C. 419; Howard v. Speight, 180 N.C. 654.

(793)


Summaries of

State v. James

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1891
13 S.E. 112 (N.C. 1891)
Case details for

State v. James

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. MARCUS JAMES

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1891

Citations

13 S.E. 112 (N.C. 1891)
108 N.C. 792

Citing Cases

State v. Hitopoulus

Although a client may waive his attorney-client privilege, the waiver must be distinct and unequivocal. State…

State v. Atkinson

In this jurisdiction unequivocal opposition to capital punishment has long been ground for disqualification…