Opinion
1 CA-CR 23-0467 PRPC
10-03-2024
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. RAMOND CURTIS JACKSON, Petitioner.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Johnny Jacquez Counsel for Respondent Ramond Curtis Jackson, Florence Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2013-002469-001 The Honorable Joseph Kiefer, Judge
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Johnny Jacquez Counsel for Respondent
Ramond Curtis Jackson, Florence Petitioner
Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Samuel A. Thumma and Judge Andrew M. Jacobs delivered the following decision.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
¶1 Petitioner Ramond Curtis Jackson seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is Jackson's fourth petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). It is Petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.