From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 10, 2013
838 N.W.2d 866 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2012AP2641.

2013-09-10

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Phillip D. JACKSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Carter, 131 Wis.2d at 78, 389 N.W.2d 1 (citation omitted). Moreover, the supreme court has made clear that “ ‘an evidentiary hearing is not mandatory if the record as a whole conclusively demonstrates that defendant is not entitled to relief, even if the motion alleges sufficient nonconclusory facts.’ ” Balliette, 336 Wis.2d 358, ¶ 50, 805 N.W.2d 334 (citation omitted).



Summaries of

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Sep 10, 2013
838 N.W.2d 866 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Phillip D. JACKSON…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Sep 10, 2013

Citations

838 N.W.2d 866 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
351 Wis. 2d 225
2013 WI App. 128