From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Itczak

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930
Mar 6, 1930
149 A. 892 (Conn. 1930)

Opinion

Argued March 5th, 1930

Decided March 6th, 1930.

INFORMATION charging the accused with committing an illegal operation, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Brown, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty and appeal by the accused. No error.

Donald C. McCarthy, for the appellant (the accused).

Donald Gaffney, with whom, on the brief, was Hugh M. Alcorn, State's Attorney, for the appellee (the State).


We have made an examination and comparison of the evidence and are convinced that the jury might reasonably have found the accused guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence was conflicting, both upon the charge of the information and upon the accused's defense of an alibi. Under these circumstances it was the province of the jury to resolve this conflict. We cannot hold that the verdict should have been set aside. State v. Chin Lung, 106 Conn. 701, 704, 139 A. 91; State v. Cianflone, 98 Conn. 454, 459, 120 A. 347.


Summaries of

State v. Itczak

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930
Mar 6, 1930
149 A. 892 (Conn. 1930)
Case details for

State v. Itczak

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT vs. MARIE ITCZAK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1930

Date published: Mar 6, 1930

Citations

149 A. 892 (Conn. 1930)
149 A. 892