From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 10, 2014
157 So. 3d 1101 (La. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2014–KK–0896.

10-10-2014

STATE of Louisiana v. Quinton DeLane INGRAM.


Opinion

Granted. The order of the court of appeal is reversed and the trial court's ruling granting defendant's motion to suppress is reinstated as well within the court's broad discretion to make credibility determinations rationally based on the evidence presented at the suppression hearing. State v. Vessell, 450 So.2d 938, 943 (La.1984) (credibility determinations made by a trial court on a motion to suppress, “like all questions of fact, [are] entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.”) (citations omitted).

GUIDRY, J., dissents and would deny the writ.

CLARK, J., dissents and would deny the writ.


Summaries of

State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 10, 2014
157 So. 3d 1101 (La. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Quinton DeLane INGRAM.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 10, 2014

Citations

157 So. 3d 1101 (La. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Foss

The district court, however, prematurely ruled before hearing testimony by the defense witness or considering…