From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District
Oct 28, 1999
No. 99AP-93 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 28, 1999)

Opinion

No. 99AP-93.

Rendered on October 28, 1999.

Schiavoni, Schiavoni Bush, Joseph J. Bush, III, and Shawn R. Muldowney, for relator.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Eugene B. Meador, for respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


IN MANDAMUS


Relator, Earl Lovejoy, has filed this original action requesting this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, Industrial Commission of Ohio, to vacate its order denying him permanent total disability compensation, and to enter an order granting said compensation.

This matter was referred to a magistrate of this court pursuant to Civ.R. 53(C), and Section (M), Loc.R. 12 of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. The magistrate issued a decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended that this court deny relator's request for a writ of mandamus. No objections have been filed to that decision.

As there have been no objections filed to the magistrate's decision, and as it contains no error of law or other defect on its face, and based on an independent review of the file, this court adopts the magistrate's decision.

Relator's request for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ of mandamus denied.

TYACK and BOWMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District
Oct 28, 1999
No. 99AP-93 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 28, 1999)
Case details for

State v. Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio ex rel. Earl Lovejoy, Relator, v. Industrial Commission of…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District

Date published: Oct 28, 1999

Citations

No. 99AP-93 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 28, 1999)