From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ibison

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Aug 18, 2017
Docket No. 44744 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2017)

Opinion

Docket No. 44744 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 552

08-18-2017

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LISA MARIE IBISON, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bingham County. Hon. Darren B. Simpson, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four and one-half years, with a minimum period of confinement of one and one-half years, for accessory to a felony, affirmed. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Lisa Marie Ibison pled guilty to accessory to a felony. Idaho Code § 18-205(2). The district court sentenced Ibison to a unified term of four and one-half years with one and one-half years determinate. Ibison appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ibison's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Ibison

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Aug 18, 2017
Docket No. 44744 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Ibison

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LISA MARIE IBISON…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Aug 18, 2017

Citations

Docket No. 44744 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2017)