Opinion
(5164)
Argued June 3, 1987
Decision released June 12, 1987
Information charging the defendant with the crimes of burglary in the third degree, larceny in the third degree and illegal possession of a narcotic substance, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Danbury and tried to the jury before Geen, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty; thereafter, the court rendered judgment of guilty of being a persistent serious felony offender, and the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Guy L. DePaul, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Susann E. Gill, deputy assistant state's attorney, with whom was Brian E. Cotter, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
The defendant challenges the constitutional validity of identification procedures used by the state. We have afforded the defendant's claims of error the appropriate scope of review, and we find nothing to support the defendant's contention that the procedures were impermissibly suggestive. See, e.g., Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); State v. Hamele, 188 Conn. 372, 377, 449 A.2d 1020 (1982); State v. DeJesus, 7 Conn. App. 309, 315, 508 A.2d 463 (1986).