State v. Huyber

1 Citing case

  1. Tate v. State

    No. A20-0869 (Minn. Ct. App. Mar. 22, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    And nothing in our nonprecedential opinions addressing good cause persuades us that appellate counsel unreasonably assessed the likelihood of successfully demonstrating prejudice from counsel's failure to object and demand a ruling on good cause. See State v. Huyber, No. A19-0760, 2020 WL 2312505, at *3-4 (Minn. App. May 11, 2020) (concluding that "good cause" requires a "legally sufficient reason," which was present when defendant's early guilty plea and other factors prevented prosecutor from giving timely notice), review denied (Minn. July 23, 2020); State v. Harrison, No. A17-0157, 2017 WL 6567654, at *6 (Minn. App. Dec. 26, 2017) (upholding implicit finding of good cause when state gave notice shortly after omnibus hearing and defendant was familiar with facts underlying aggravated sentence), review denied (Minn. Mar. 20, 2018). Tate's appellate counsel similarly determined, after deliberation and consultation with her supervisor, that there was no reasonable basis to conclude that the district court would have denied the state's request to seek an aggravated sentence if trial counsel had objected to the state's deficient notice.