From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hutchinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Dec 30, 1996
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9512-CC-00430 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 30, 1996)

Opinion

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9512-CC-00430.

December 30, 1996.

APPEAL FROM HICKMAN COUNTY, HON. DONALD P. HARRIS, JUDGE

For the Appellant:

DALE M. QUILLEN

For the Appellee:

CHARLES W. BURSON, Attorney General and Reporter, ROBIN L. HARRIS Assistant Attorney General, JOE D. BAUGH, JR., District Attorney General, RONALD L. DAVIS, Assistant District Attorney


AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20


ORDER

This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant complains that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying Appellant probation. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

Appellant was convicted on a plea of nolo contendere to the offense of rape by force or coercion, a Class B felony. Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 39-13-503. Appellant does not therefore enjoy the presumption that he is entitled to a sentence which does not involve incarceration. See, Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 40-35-102(6).

The record reflects that Appellant was a friend of the twelve year old victim's family. Exploiting this relationship, Appellant repeatedly and on separate occasions committed forcible oral and vaginal rape upon the victim. As a result the young victim suffered great psychological trauma, was hospitalized, medicated and even attempted suicide. Appellant also wrote a letter to the victim expressing his desire to engage in this same conduct with the victim's sister.

The trial court found that the especially shocking and reprehensible nature of this offense and the need to avoid depreciating the seriousness of the offense outweighed any favorable evidence in favor of granting probation. Having conducted a de novo review of the trial court's decision with a presumption that it is correct, we find that the law and evidence amply supports the decision to deny Appellant probation.

We further find that an opinion in this matter would not have any precedential value. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

______________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

______________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

______________________________________ WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE


Summaries of

State v. Hutchinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville
Dec 30, 1996
C.C.A. No. 01C01-9512-CC-00430 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 30, 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hutchinson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee, v. JOSH HUTCHINSON, Appellant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Nashville

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

C.C.A. No. 01C01-9512-CC-00430 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 30, 1996)