From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 4, 2012
758 S.E.2d 848 (N.C. 2012)

Opinion

No. 430PA11.

2012-10-4

STATE of North Carolina v. Latara Deshea HURST.

Leslie C. Rawls, for Hurst, Latara Deshea. Seth P. Rosebrock, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.


Leslie C. Rawls, for Hurst, Latara Deshea. Seth P. Rosebrock, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.
Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

ORDER

The defendant's petition for writ of certiorari in this matter is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits of defendant's appeal. The petition for discretionary review filed by the defendant is dismissed as moot.:

“Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of October 2012.”

The defendant's petition for writ of certiorari in this matter is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits of defendant's appeal. The petition for discretionary review filed by the defendant is dismissed as moot.:

“Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of October 2012.”


Summaries of

State v. Hurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 4, 2012
758 S.E.2d 848 (N.C. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Latara Deshea HURST.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Oct 4, 2012

Citations

758 S.E.2d 848 (N.C. 2012)
366 N.C. 398
366 N.C. 374