From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 17, 1909
83 S.C. 193 (S.C. 1909)

Opinion

7243

July 17, 1909.

Before GARY, J., Richland, June, 1908. Affirmed.

Indictment against Glenn Hunt. From judgment on Circuit, defendant appeals.

Mr. Pringle T. Youmans, for appellant, cites: Application should be made to military authorities for person of soldier: 59 Art. War; 2 Win. Mil. L., 1076, 1077, 1079.

Solicitor W. Hampton Cobb, contra. Oral argument.


July 17, 1909. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


The defendant was indicted for violation of the dispensary law. The jury rendered a verdict of guilty, whereupon his Honor, the presiding Judge, imposed sentence upon him, and he appealed.

The appellant abandoned all his exceptions, except the third, which is as follows: "That his Honor abused his discretion in not continuing the case, for the reason that the defendant was in the military service of the United States, on special detail, by command of his superior officers."

The following statement appears in the record: "It is agreed that the defendant was a duly enlisted member of the Second Regiment Infantry, N.G.S.C., and when the case was tried was on duty with his regiment, at Charleston, S.C."

But it nowhere appears in the record that there was a motion for a continuance on that ground.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 17, 1909
83 S.C. 193 (S.C. 1909)
Case details for

State v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. HUNT

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 17, 1909

Citations

83 S.C. 193 (S.C. 1909)
65 S.E. 176

Citing Cases

Ilderton v. Charleston Consol. Ry. Co.

Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Mr. W. Huger FitzSimons, for appellants, submits: Admission…

Graham v. Railroad Co.

Messrs. Ragsdale Whiting, contra, cite: Master isliable for wrongful act of his employee within the scope…