State v. Hughes

1 Citing case

  1. Mendez-Garcia v. State

    ID. No. 1903019680 (Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 24, 2020)

    May 21, 1993) ("A finding of probable cause does not require the police to uncover information sufficient to prove a suspect's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt or even to prove that guilt is more likely than not."); State v. Hughes, 2003 WL 21213709, at *2 (Del. Super. May 6, 2003) ("Although the facts considered in isolation may be insufficient to establish probable cause, when viewing the facts in the totality of the circumstances it appears that the police possessed enough trustworthy information to warrant a man of reasonable caution to conclude that [the defendant] was driving under the influence..."). Upon thorough review of the record, this Court concludes that the Trial Court's finding of probable cause to subject Appellant to the Intoxilyzer test is proper.