Summary
In Hufanga, we held there was sufficient foundation to admit video evidence under HRE Rule 901(b)(1) where a witness testified he owned the video recording system, testified that it was functioning properly at the time in question, and testified "as to the recordings' accurate representation of the locations, furniture, and people present" on the date of the recording.
Summary of this case from State v. LukeOpinion
NO. CAAP-17-0000737
04-04-2019
STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel HUFANGA, Defendant-Appellant
On the briefs: Walter J. Rodby, for Defendant-Appellant. Sonja P. McCullen, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City and County of Honolulu, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
AFFIRMED. VACATE. REMAND.