From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hubbard

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 21, 1992
826 P.2d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

C900386CR; CA A68539

Argued and submitted December 9, 1991

Affirmed February 12, 1992 Reconsideration denied April 15, 1992 Petition for review denied July 21, 1992 ( 313 Or. 627)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County.

Timothy P. Alexander, Judge.

Laura Graser, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant appeals his sentence on one count of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, and two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree. ORS 163.205. The trial court sentenced defendant to 30 months incarceration for the assault; 12 months incarceration, consecutive to the assault sentence, for one of the criminal mistreatment counts and 6 months, concurrent on the other mistreatment count. This sentence constitutes an "upward departure," because it is longer than the presumptive sentence provided under the sentencing guidelines.

Defendant concedes that the trial court complied with OAR 253-08-001 by stating on the record what it believed to be substantial and compelling reasons for the departure. Defendant argues only that the evidence was insufficient to support the factors that the trial court used to justify the departure. We do not reach the merits of his argument, because defendant did not object to the upward departure at the time of sentencing or otherwise preserve the claim of error. State v. Orsi/Gauthier, 108 Or. App. 176, 813 P.2d 82 (1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Hubbard

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 21, 1992
826 P.2d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHRISTIAN MATHEW HUBBARD, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 21, 1992

Citations

826 P.2d 642 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
826 P.2d 642

Citing Cases

State v. Maki

He is precluded from making that argument now, because he has failed to preserve any claim of error. State v.…