From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hubbard

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 265 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 65530, 67893.

February 20, 1996. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 2, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; EDWARD M. PEEK, JUDGE.

Deborah B. Wafer, District Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a class X offender to a twenty-five year prison term. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Hubbard

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
918 S.W.2d 265 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT v. PAUL HUBBARD…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

918 S.W.2d 265 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)