From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Howe

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 25, 2017
2017 N.D. 90 (N.D. 2017)

Opinion

No. 20160331

04-25-2017

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Richard Scott Howe, Defendant and Appellant

Aaron W. Roseland, P.O. Box 390, Hettinger, ND 58639, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Adams County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda Rae Ehlis, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Aaron W. Roseland, P.O. Box 390, Hettinger, ND 58639, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Laura C. Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Richard Howe appeals a district court's judgment after a jury convicted him on two counts of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia. Howe argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol Ronning Kapsner


Summaries of

State v. Howe

SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 25, 2017
2017 N.D. 90 (N.D. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Howe

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Richard Scott Howe…

Court:SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Apr 25, 2017

Citations

2017 N.D. 90 (N.D. 2017)