From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Howard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 1, 1988
541 A.2d 1295 (Me. 1988)

Opinion

Argued May 12, 1988.

Decided June 1, 1988.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Androscoggin County.

Janet T. Mills (orally), Dist. Atty., Auburn, for the State.

Valerie Stanfill (orally), Berman, Simmons Goldberg, Lewiston, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Elmer Joe Howard appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, on a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp. 1987). Our review of the record discloses that, contrary to Howard's contention, the verdicts were not irreconcilably inconsistent because the jury did not find him guilty on all counts charged in the indictment, State v. Neron, 519 A.2d 197, 201 (Me. 1986); viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt all the elements of the offense charged, State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me. 1985); and at sentencing the trial court properly could consider the offense in relation to its effect on the victim of the crime, State v. Samson, 388 A.2d 60, 67-68 (Me. 1978); 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1257(2) (Supp. 1987).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Howard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 1, 1988
541 A.2d 1295 (Me. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Elmer Joe HOWARD

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Jun 1, 1988

Citations

541 A.2d 1295 (Me. 1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Fleming

State v. Dumont, 507 A.2d 164, 166-67 (Me. 1986) (no abuse of discretion by court in considering affidavits…