From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Houston-Sconiers

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1032 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92605–1

06-29-2016

State of Washington, Respondent, v. Zyion Houston–Sconiers and Treson Roberts, Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 28, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitions for Review are granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Houston-Sconiers

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 29, 2016
185 Wn. 2d 1032 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Houston-Sconiers

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Respondent, v. Zyion Houston–Sconiers and Treson…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

185 Wn. 2d 1032 (Wash. 2016)
185 Wash. 2d 1032
377 P.3d 737

Citing Cases

State v. Saloy

Saloy relies on the reasoning in Miller v. Alabama and the dissent in Division Two's recent decision in State…

State v. Houston-Sconiers

We granted review of these consolidated cases. State v. Houston-Sconiers , 185 Wash.2d 1032, 377 P.3d 737…