From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hop

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 11, 1982
648 P.2d 1362 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-936-C, CA A24187

Submitted on record and briefs July 9, 1982.

Reversed and remanded August 11, 1982.

Appeal from District Court, Jackson County, Robert Warren, Judge.

Steven P. Pickens, Medford, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded.


Defendant appeals his conviction after a plea of guilty. He contends that the court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that he was not adequately advised of the consequences of a guilty plea as required by ORS 135.385(2)(a). The state concedes that the advice was inadequate but contends defendant cannot raise that issue on appeal from a guilty plea. The issue raised is cognizable on appeal. State v. Dawson, 57 Or. App. 420, 644 P.2d 665 (1982); State v. Reichert, 39 Or. App. 905, 593 P.2d 1298 (1979).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Hop

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 11, 1982
648 P.2d 1362 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Hop

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HAROLD LEE HOP, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 11, 1982

Citations

648 P.2d 1362 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
648 P.2d 1362