From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hoomissen

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 27, 1996
918 P.2d 429 (Or. 1996)

Opinion

DC DA469399; CA A78558; SC S41295

Argued and submitted November 3, 1994,

Decision of the Court of Appeals Affirmed by an equally divided court June 27, 1996

On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Multnomah County District Court, David Gernant, Judge. 125 Or. App. 682, 866 P.2d 521 (1994).

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Fadeley, Unis, Graber, and Durham, Justices.

Van Hoomissen, J., did not participate in this opinion.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

State v. Hoomissen

Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 27, 1996
918 P.2d 429 (Or. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hoomissen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. GEORGE THOMAS VAN HOOMISSEN…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jun 27, 1996

Citations

918 P.2d 429 (Or. 1996)
918 P.2d 429