From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hooks

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1926
136 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)

Opinion

(Filed 31 December, 1926.)

APPEAL by defendant from Cranmer, J., at August Term, 1926, of WAYNE. No error.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

J. Faison Thompson and Hugh Dortch for defendant.


The defendant was prosecuted for having liquor in his possession for the purpose of sale and was convicted. We have examined the several assignments of error and find that under numerous decisions all the exceptions must be overruled.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Hooks

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1926
136 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Hooks

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. EXUM HOOKS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1926

Citations

136 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1926)
136 S.E. 927