From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Holt

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81422

May 20, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Honorable Hadley E. Grimm.

Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Stephanie Morrell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.


[THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]


ORDER


Defendant Jeremy Holt ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of the class C felony of receiving stolen property in violation of section 570.080 RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the state to argue facts not in evidence during its closing.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no plain error. Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Holt

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JEREMY HOLT, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)