From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 2, 1998
967 S.W.2d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. WD 52081, 54502 Consolidated

OPINION FILED: June 2, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI, HONORABLE SANFORD F. CONLEY, IV, JUDGE.

Kent Denzel, Columbia, for Appellant.

John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before: Presiding Judge Ellis, Judge Lowenstein and Judge Riederer


ORDER


Appellant-Movant was convicted of robbery first degree, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and possession of a controlled substance. On direct appeal he seeks reversal, under plain error, for the prosecutor's closing argument. In his Rule 29.15 appeal he asserts counsel was incompetent for failure to object in closing argument, and for failing to seek a change of venue based on pretrial publicity. Judgments affirmed. Rule 30.25 (b) and Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

State v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jun 2, 1998
967 S.W.2d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. HUBERT HOLMES, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jun 2, 1998

Citations

967 S.W.2d 725 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)