Opinion
ID No. 0902002692.
Submitted: April 12, 2011.
Decided: April 18, 2011.
On Defendant's Second Pro Se Motion for Postconviction Relief. DENIED.
Daniel McBride, Deputy Attorney General, Wilmington, Delaware. Attorney for State of Delaware.
Brandon L. Hill, Howard R. Young Correctional, Wilmington, Delaware. Pro Se Defendant.
ORDER
On this 18th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant's Pro Se Motion for Postconviction Relief, it appears to the Court that:
1. On March 22, 2011, the Court ruled on the Motion for Postconviction Relief previously filed by the Defendant. In that Motion, the Defendant raised claims for ineffective assistance of counsel which were denied by the Court.
2. On April 12, 2011, the Defendant filed a second Motion for Postconviction Relief, which again alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and asserts similar claims to those previously addressed in the first motion.
3. As a result, the Defendant's second Motion for Postconviction Relief is hereby DENIED pursuant to Rule 61(i)(4) as those claims were previously adjudicated in the prior Motion for Postconviction Relief, and the Court finds there is no basis to consider them in the interest of justice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.