From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 14, 1986
719 P.2d 67 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

C85-02-30683; CA A37156

Argued and submitted March 31, 1986.

Affirmed as modified May 14, 1986.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Stephen B. Herrell, Judge.

J. Marvin Kuhn, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Judgment modified to provide that sentence run concurrently with that imposed in cases C82-02-33994 and C85-06-32269; affirmed as modified.


Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. The state confesses that the trial court erred by sentencing him to five years probation to run consecutively to a sentence imposed in cases C82-02-33994 and C85-06-32269. We agree. See State v. Barnes, 58 Or. App. 516, 518, 648 P.2d 1306 (1982). It appears that the imposition of the consecutive sentence may have been due to a scrivener's error. We modify the judgment to provide that the probation in this case shall run concurrently with the sentence in the other cases.

Defendant's other assignment of error is without merit, and we therefore affirm the judgment as modified.

Judgment modified to provide that sentence shall run concurrently with that imposed in cases C82-02-33994 and C85-06-32269; affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 14, 1986
719 P.2d 67 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY ELLSWORTH HILL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1986

Citations

719 P.2d 67 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
719 P.2d 67