From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Highsmith

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 10, 1916
103 S.C. 168 (S.C. 1916)

Opinion

9254

January 10, 1916.

Before MAULDIN and SHIPP, JJ., Sumter, 1915. Order of supersedeas.

Action by W.A. Thompson against Z.F. Highsmith, in which an order of injunction was granted by Judge Mauldin against defendant. Thereafter, in a proceeding by the State for contempt for violating the order, defendant was adjudged guilty by Judge Shipp. Defendant having appealed from both orders, he moves to suspend their operation until the appeal shall be heard and decided. Motion granted on defendant's execution of a surety bond.

Mr. R.D. Epps, for appellant.

Mr. John H. Clifton, for respondent.


January 10, 1916.


The motion is by defendant, Highsmith, to suspend the operation of Judge Shipp's order until the appeal by Highsmith from Judge Mauldin's order shall have been heard and decided.

We think the motion must be granted, but only upon execution of a bond for $200, with surety to be approved by the clerk of Court for Sumter, conditioned to pay so much as the plaintiff, Thompson, may recover in his action against Highsmith.


Summaries of

State v. Highsmith

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 10, 1916
103 S.C. 168 (S.C. 1916)
Case details for

State v. Highsmith

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. HIGHSMITH. THOMPSON v. SAME

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 10, 1916

Citations

103 S.C. 168 (S.C. 1916)
87 S.E. 482

Citing Cases

McDonald et al. v. Palmetto Theaters et al

Original injunction proceeding by Palmetto Theaters, Employer, and Employers Group, insurance carrier,…

S.C. Pub. Serv. Authority v. Carolina P. L

As to an electric cooperativehaving the right before the Public Service Commission tochallenge the actions of…