From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hickerson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb 4, 2014
418 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 99498.

2014-02-4

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric B. HICKERSON, Defendant/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Ted C. House, Judge. Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Eric B. Hickerson, Boonville, MO, pro se.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Ted C. House, Judge.
Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Eric B. Hickerson, Boonville, MO, pro se.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Eric B. Hickerson appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his Motion for Post–Conviction DNA Testing without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. State v. Ruff, 256 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Hickerson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb 4, 2014
418 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Hickerson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric B. HICKERSON…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

418 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)