Opinion
No. 2013AP944–CR.
2013-10-23
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Richard P. HESSIL, Defendant–Appellant.
State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis.2d 768, 772–73, 576 N.W.2d 30 (1998) (footnote omitted). Looking at this case, Hessil is claiming that Pergande was the aggressor. He asserts that Pergande's testimony about what happened regarding the altercation near his garage is a lie and argues that these other acts are relevant and probative to what he wanted to prove to the jury. But are they relevant and probative? We take a look.