(A174188) (331 Or.App. 193) PETITION FOR REVIEW ALLOWED

A174188S070999 09-19-2024 STATE v. Ervan Ronell HERRING (331 Or App 193) Review Allowed.

See, e.g., State v. Herring, 331 Or.App. 193, 215-16,P.3d(2024) (holding that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence that was "relevant without resort to speculation"); Jackson, 368 Or at 716-17 (stating that whether relevant evidence is admissible depends on both "the ultimate fact that the proponent seeks to prove" and the chain of inferences necessary to connect the evidence to the ultimate fact not relying on propensity of the defendant); Taylor, 326 Or.App. at 408-09 (holding that relevant evidence that does not require a propensity bridge is admissible to show a defendant's plan). Additionally, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it held that the evidence was substantially more probative than prejudicial under OEC 403.