From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Herrera

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2013
2013-UP-386 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-386

10-09-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Miguel Herrera, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-213538

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia; and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted August 1, 2013

Appeal From Darlington County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia; and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C. J, and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Herrera

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2013
2013-UP-386 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Herrera

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Miguel Herrera, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-386 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)