State v. Herrera

Full title: The State, Respodent, v. Miguel Herrera, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-213538 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-213538 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-386

2013-10-09

The State, Respodent, v. Miguel Herrera, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia; and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Darlington County

Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia; and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.