From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hernandez

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jul 1, 2009
681 S.E.2d 866 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding the trial court's finding of fact that "the officer activated his blue lights and initiated a seizure of the defendant and his vehicle" related to the denial of defendant's motion to suppress, was binding on appeal because it was supported by competent evidence

Summary of this case from State v. Baker
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 09-947

31 July 2009

ORDER

The following order was entered:

The motion filed in this cause on the 31st of July 2009 and designated `Motion to Deem Record on Appeal Timely Filed' is allowed. Record on appeal is deemed timely filed.

By order of the Court this the 31st of July 2009.

Summaries of

State v. Hernandez

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jul 1, 2009
681 S.E.2d 866 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)

concluding the trial court's finding of fact that "the officer activated his blue lights and initiated a seizure of the defendant and his vehicle" related to the denial of defendant's motion to suppress, was binding on appeal because it was supported by competent evidence

Summary of this case from State v. Baker
Case details for

State v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 1, 2009

Citations

681 S.E.2d 866 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

State v. Baker

See State v. Williams, ___ N.C. App. ___, 686 S.E.2d 905 (2009) (concluding no seizure occurred for purposes…

1 Citing Cases