From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Henningsen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Aug 29, 2013
838 N.W.2d 136 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2012AP1645–CR.

2013-08-29

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Daniel P. HENNINGSEN, Defendant–Appellant.

Henningsen argues that the court's determination that Henningsen forfeited his right-of-way by speeding was contrary to the right-of-way rules under Wis. Stat. § 346.18 (2011–12). 1 He points out that § 346.18(1), which applies to uncontrolled intersections, states that driving at an unlawful speed forfeits the right-of-way under that subsection; § 346.18(3), which applies to intersections with through highways, does not contain the forfeiture language. Henningsen argues that, contrary to the circuit court's statements, Henningsen had the right-of-way on the highway. Thus, Henningsen asserts, Gray caused the crash by failing to yield the right-of-way.



Summaries of

State v. Henningsen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Aug 29, 2013
838 N.W.2d 136 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Henningsen

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Daniel P. HENNINGSEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Aug 29, 2013

Citations

838 N.W.2d 136 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013)
350 Wis. 2d 506
2013 WI App. 115