State v. Hazley

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Carbajal

    No. A19-0866 (Minn. Ct. App. May. 26, 2020)

    Because Carbajal did not object to wearing jail clothing at trial, we review the district court's decision for plain error. State v. Hazley, 901 N.W.2d 452, 453 (Minn. App. 2017), review denied (Minn. Nov. 14, 2017); Minn. R. Crim. P. 31.02. The plain-error standard requires Carbajal to show: "(1) error; (2) that was plain; and (3) that affected substantial rights."

  2. State v. Logan

    No. A17-0878 (Minn. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2018)

    The law does not distinguish what clothes are appropriate on the basis of whether the trial is a bench trial or a jury trial. State v. Hazley, 901 N.W.2d 452, 455 (Minn. App. 2017), review denied (Minn. Nov. 14, 2017). This court has stated that a district court requiring a defendant to wear jail clothes in open court is a due-process violation.