In fact, the defendants having failed to make motions for nonsuit (C. S., 4643) waived their right as to the insufficiency of evidence to warrant a conviction. S. v. Hayes, 187 N.C. 490. The defendants contend: "4. That the court below committed error in failing to charge the jury to some extent upon the evidence of the case, and in failing to charge the jury upon the law relative to a simple assault in accordance with cases: S. v. Brooks, 76 N.C. 1, and S. v. Nash, 109 N.C. 824."
This motion was overruled and the defendant offered evidence in his own behalf tending to establish his innocence. The motion for nonsuit was not renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence, and therefore the insufficiency of evidence to warrant conviction was waived, and cannot now be considered by this Court on appeal. S. v. Hayes, 187 N.C. 490."
There was ample evidence offered on the hearing to warrant the jury in finding, as it did, that the defendant, with a felonious intent, received the automobile in question, the property of one Cahoon, valued at $300, from Sam Lougee and Lewis Powell, knowing at the time that the same had been feloniously stolen or taken and carried away by them. C.S., 4250; S. v. Caveness, 78 N.C. 484; S. v. Hayes, 187 N.C. 490. There was evidence that the same persons who stole the automobile, used it in burglarizing the residence of Townsend Chappell, a blind merchant of Perquimans County. The defendant herein was also under indictment, charged with being an accessory to said burglary.
Error. Cited: Berry v. Durham, 186 N.C. 425; Gunter v. Sanford, 186 N.C. 457; Bank v. Watson, 187 N.C. 111; Blair v. Comrs., 187 N.C. 490; Road Comm. v. Comrs., 188 N.C. 365; Hahn v. Fletcher, 189 N.C. 731; Farrow v. Ins. Co., 192 N.C. 150; Coble v. Dick, 194 N.C. 733; In re Assessment against Railroad, 196 N.C. 761; Saluda v. Polk County, 207 N.C. 183; Raleigh v. Bank, 223 N.C. 293; Goldsboro v. R. R., 241 N.C. 225; Roberts v. Bottling Co., 257 N.C. 658.
Cited: Power Co. v. Power Co., 171 N.C. 256 (2c); Swindell v. Belhaven, 173 N.C. 4 2d; Swindell v. Belhaven, 173 N.C. 5 (1e); Swindell v. Belhaven, 173 N.C. 6 (1c); Rankin v. Gaston County, 173 N.C. 684 (2c); Kornegay v. Goldsboro, 180 N.C. 451 (2c); Young v. Davis, 182 N.C. 203, 204 (2c); Kinston v. R.R., 183 N.C. 20 3d; Wilson v. Comrs., 183 N.C. 640 (2c); Armstrong v. Comrs., 185 N.C. 408 (1e); Comrs. v. Comrs., 186 N.C. 204 (1c); Felmet v. Comrs., 186 N.C. 252 (2c); Blair v. Comrs. of New Hanover, 187 N.C. 490 2d; Road Com.v. Comrs., 188 N.C. 365 3d; Litchfield v. Roper, 192 N.C. 206 (1c); Flowers v. Charlotte, 195 N.C. 602 (3c); Martin v. Sanatorium, 200 N.C. 225 (1c); Hammond v. Charlotte, 205 N.C. 472 (2c); Rogers v. Davis, 212 N.C. 36 (2c); Guilford County v. Estates Administration, 212 N.C. 655 (1c); Fletcher v. Comrs. of Buncombe, 218 N.C. 7 (2c); Cox v. Brown, 218 N.C. 355 (1c); S. v. Calcutt, 219 N.C. 556 (2c); Charlotte v. Kavanaugh, 221 N.C. 263 (2c); Power Co. v. Bowles, 229 N.C. 150 (2c). (200)
No error. Cited: Bank v. Loven, 172 N.C. 670 (5b); Board of Agriculture v. Drainage District, 177 N.C. 226 (5g); S. v. Burnett, 184 N.C. 786 (3f); Felmet v. Comrs., 186 N.C. 252 (2g); Blair v. Comrs., 187 N.C. 490 (2g, 5g); Hunt v. Eure, 188 N.C. 719 (5g); Asheville v. Herbert, 190 N.C. 736 (2g); Ins. Co. v. Wade, 195 N.C. 425 (2g); Hagood v. Doughton, 195 N.C. 819 (5g); R. R. v. Gaston County, 200 N.C. 783 (2f); Hammond v. Charlotte, 205 N.C. 472 (2g); Burt v. Biscoe, 209 N.C. 74 (5g); Rogers v. Davis, 212 N.C. 36 (2g); S. v. Dixon, 215 N.C. 165 (6g); Charlotte v. Kavanaugh, 221 N.C. 263 (2g); Valentine v. Gill, Comr. of Revenue, 223 N.C. 399 (5g); Power Co. v. Bowles, 229 N.C. 150 (2g).