From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harvill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 24, 2003
860 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

holding that party may challenge revocation of certificate by filing either mandamus petition or other appropriate action in trial court

Summary of this case from Lazard v. State

Opinion

Case No. 5D02-1193.

Opinion filed October 24, 2003 Rehearing Denied December 12, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Terrence E. Kehoe, Law Offices of Terrence E. Kehoe, and James M. Russ, Law Offices of James M. Russ, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.


The State of Florida appeals the trial court's order expunging Kevin S. Harvill's non-judicial criminal history records. We reverse.

Section 943.0585, Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the courts "shall not order a criminal justice agency to expunge a criminal history record until the person seeking to expunge a criminal history has applied for and received a certificate of eligibility for expunction." Here, Harvill filed his petition to expunge and attached the required certificate of eligibility from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). However, several days before the hearing on Harvill's motion, FDLE advised Harvill's attorney and the State that it was revoking the certificate of eligibility because FDLE learned that Harvill secured a prior sealing or expunction of a criminal history record in Louisiana.

The existence of a valid certificate of eligibility is a condition precedent to the court's consideration of an expungement petition. State v. Plotka, 689 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We conclude that the trial court erred when it failed to consider that because FDLE revoked the required certificate of eligibility, Harvill had not complied with the required conditions precedent. If Harvill believes that FDLE has erroneously revoked his certificate of eligibility, he may "file either a mandamus petition, or other appropriate action, in the trial court to resolve the dispute." See Rowell v. State, Fla. Dep't of Law Enforcement, 700 So.2d 1242, 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We reverse the trial court's order and remand the matter for further consideration consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J. and PLEUS, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harvill

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 24, 2003
860 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

holding that party may challenge revocation of certificate by filing either mandamus petition or other appropriate action in trial court

Summary of this case from Lazard v. State
Case details for

State v. Harvill

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. KEVIN SCOTT HARVILL, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 24, 2003

Citations

860 So. 2d 999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Where a certificate of expunction has been denied, the correct procedure to challenge FDLE's ruling is to…

Lazard v. State

The correct procedure to challenge the denial of a certificate of eligibility is a petition for writ of…