State v. Hartrampf

1 Citing case

  1. Outdoors Systems, Inc. v. Cobb County

    555 S.E.2d 689 (Ga. 2001)   Cited 5 times

    Thus, a sufficient attack on the constitutionality of the ordinance was raised in the BZA. Moreover, in State v. Hartrampf, 273 Ga. 522, 523 ( 544 S.E.2d 130) (2001), which was decided just six months ago, we held that § 134-346 violates the Georgia Constitution because it "operates to create the situation prohibited by OCGA § 32-6-83; assuming that a sign has been damaged and, under the ordinance is in a condition so as not to be repaired, the ordinance effects its removal without compensation." Here, Cobb County revoked Outdoor's permit in reliance on § 134-346, contending that the sign, as the result of an Act of God, was in a condition such that repair was prohibited.