From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hartley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 24, 1987
522 A.2d 368 (Me. 1987)

Opinion

Argued March 4, 1987.

Decided March 24, 1987.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Somerset County.

David W. Crook, Dist. Atty., William Baghdoyan (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Skowhegan, for the State.

Norman S. Heitmann, III, Brad Snow (orally), Tanous Heitmann, Millinocket, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On the single issue of sufficiency of the evidence, the Defendant, Harold Hartley, appealed from a judgment of conviction of three sexual offenses as a result of guilty findings in Superior Court, Somerset County. We are satisfied that the factfinder rationally could find all the elements of the three offenses. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me. 1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Hartley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 24, 1987
522 A.2d 368 (Me. 1987)
Case details for

State v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Harold HARTLEY

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Mar 24, 1987

Citations

522 A.2d 368 (Me. 1987)