From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harrison

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 14, 1983
442 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-88.

December 14, 1983.

On Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari to the Circuit Court in and for Broward County; H. Mark Purdy, Judge.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Max Rudmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

J. David Bogenschutz of Varon Stahl, P.A., Hollywood, for respondent Harrison.

Robert M. Leen of Leen and Schneider, Hollywood, for respondent Patricia Wolack.


Based upon the authority of Novo v. Scott, 438 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1983) we grant the state's petition for certiorari and quash the trial court's order which held that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982) is unconstitutional. We adopt the rationale of our sister court and "hold that section 914.04 is constitutional and affords a witness derivative-use immunity." Novo v. Scott, supra.

HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harrison

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 14, 1983
442 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. HOYT VERNON HARRISON, A/K/A JAMES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 14, 1983

Citations

442 So. 2d 389 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. Mitrani

This statute provides use and derivative use immunity. State v. Harrison, 442 So.2d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).…

Menut v. State

The Florida Statute provides both use and derivative use immunity. State v. Harrison, 442 So.2d 389 (Fla. 4th…