From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County
Nov 7, 2003
2003 Ohio 5961 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

C.A. Case No. 19397, T.C. Case No. 2001 CR 3081.

Rendered November 7, 2003.

(Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court).

NATALIA S. HARRIS, Atty. Reg. No. 0072431, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, 5th Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45422, Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee.

DAVID H. LANDON, Atty. Reg. No. 0029185, 322 South Patterson Blvd., Dayton, Ohio 45402, Attorney for Defendant-Appellant.


OPINION


{¶ 1} Eric Harris was found guilty after a bench trial of carrying concealed weapons, a fourth degree felony. He was sentenced to community control sanctions. On appeal, Harris advances three assignments of error:

{¶ 2} "1. The trial court should have sustained the motion to dismiss because Ohio Revised Code 2923.12, as applied, is unconstitutional since it presumes a person guilty till proven innocent.

{¶ 3} "2. The trial court should have granted the motion to dismiss because Ohio Revised code 2923.12 restriction of concealing weapons infringes on an individual's fundamental right to bear arms.

{¶ 4} "3. The trial court should have granted the motion to dismiss because the affirmative defenses provided by R.C. 2923.12 are unconstitutionally vague."

{¶ 5} All three assignments implicate the constitutionality of R.C. 2923.12, and they are overruled on the authority of Klein v. Leis, 99 Ohio St.3d 537, 2003-Ohio-4779.

{¶ 6} The judgment will be affirmed.

Fain, P.J. and Brogan, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County
Nov 7, 2003
2003 Ohio 5961 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERIC DARNELL HARRIS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Montgomery County

Date published: Nov 7, 2003

Citations

2003 Ohio 5961 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)