From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 3, 2017
388 P.3d 627 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

rejecting defendant's argument that "because alleging ineffective assistance of counsel may create a possible conflict of interest between the defendant and his attorney, the district court has an obligation to inquire further about allegations of ineffectiveness"

Summary of this case from State v. Rabold

Opinion

No. 114,804

02-03-2017

State of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jared M. Harris, Appellant.

Heather Cessna, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Amanda G. Voth, assistant solicitor general, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 3, 2017
388 P.3d 627 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

rejecting defendant's argument that "because alleging ineffective assistance of counsel may create a possible conflict of interest between the defendant and his attorney, the district court has an obligation to inquire further about allegations of ineffectiveness"

Summary of this case from State v. Rabold
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:State of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jared M. Harris, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

Citations

388 P.3d 627 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Rabold

Other jurisdictions have rejected Rabold's argument, and so must we. See Neal v. State, 379 S.W.3d 209, 222…