Opinion
1 CA-CR 22-0198 PRPC
11-22-2022
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. RANDY JEROME HARRIS, Petitioner.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent Randy Jerome Harris, Buckeye Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR0000-144541 The Honorable Laura M. Reckart, Judge
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent
Randy Jerome Harris, Buckeye Petitioner
Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr., and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
¶1 Petitioner Randy Jerome Harris seeks review of the superior court's order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's fourth petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, petition, and appendix. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.