From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 5, 1994
872 P.2d 445 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

CR90-551C; CA A72503

On respondent's motion for reconsideration filed March 4, 1994.

reconsideration allowed; opinion ( 126 Or. App. 516, 869 P.2d 868) modified; remanded for entry of corrected judgment April 27, 1994. Petition for review denied July 5, 1994 ( 319 Or. 281).

Appeal from Circuit Court, Yamhill County, John W. Hitchcock, Judge. (Amended Judgment)

Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, for motion.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.


LEESON, J.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; remanded for entry of corrected judgment deleting sentence of life imprisonment.


Pursuant to ORAP 6.25(1)(b), we allow the state's motion for reconsideration of the disposition of this case, in which we remanded for resentencing with instructions to delete defendant's sentence of life imprisonment. State v. Harris, 126 Or. App. 516, 869 P.2d 868 (1994). We agree that defendant need not be present for resentencing and that the case should be remanded for entry of a corrected judgment deleting defendant's sentence of life imprisonment. State v. Bivens, 127 Or. App. 83, 871 P.2d 486 (1994). The judgment already contains a life-time period of post-prison supervision. Defendant's 25-year minimum term is lawful.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; remanded for entry of corrected judgment deleting sentence of life imprisonment.


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 5, 1994
872 P.2d 445 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN LAYTON HARRIS, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 5, 1994

Citations

872 P.2d 445 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
872 P.2d 445

Citing Cases

State v. Harris

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 23, 1994. Respondent's motion for reconsideration…

State v. Guritz

We first address defendant's assignment concerning the admission of evidence of the marijuana purchase,…