From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harrington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 16, 1993
848 S.W.2d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 60143, 61923.

March 16, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MICHAEL J. HART, JUDGE.

Marilynn Rydlund, Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant was convicted by jury of possession of cocaine, a Class C felony, and distribution of cocaine near a school, a Class A felony. He was sentenced as a prior offender. He appeals the denial, after a hearing, of his 29.15 motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel and appeals his conviction under § 195.214, RSMo (Supp. 1992). We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b). No error of law appears; the motion court's findings are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only.


Summaries of

State v. Harrington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Mar 16, 1993
848 S.W.2d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY HARRINGTON, APPELLANT. ANTHONY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Mar 16, 1993

Citations

848 S.W.2d 643 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)