From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harper

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1874
71 N.C. 314 (N.C. 1874)

Opinion

(June Term, 1874.)

(See Syllabus in the case of State v. Parrott and others, in which both facts and the points decided are the same as in this case.)

INDICTMENT for trespass in tearing down a portion of a Railroad bridge, tried before Clarke, J., at the Spring Term, 1874, of LENOIR Superior Court.

Attorney General Hargrove, Pou, Seymour and Lehman, for the State.

Smith Strong, for the defendants.


The facts, like those of the next preceding case, found by the special verdict of the jury, are the same as those in the State v. Parrott, ante, 311.

Upon the special verdict his Honor held that the defendants were not guilty, whereupon the State appealed.


The facts in this case are the same as in State v. Parrott, ante, 311, at this term, and the decision is the same and for the same reasons.

Let the decision in this and the opinion in that, be certified as the decision and opinion in this case, to the end that the Court below may proceed to judgment, discharging the defendants as upon a verdict of not guilty.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Lumber Co., 116 N.C. 742.

(315)


Summaries of

State v. Harper

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1874
71 N.C. 314 (N.C. 1874)
Case details for

State v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. JAMES W. HARPER AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1874

Citations

71 N.C. 314 (N.C. 1874)

Citing Cases

Commissioners v. Lumber Co.

We think that the facts justified the heavy expenditure it has made in the reasonable expectation that the…

State v. Parrott

Judgment affirmed. Cited; S. v. Harper, 71 N.C. 314; S. v. Club, 100 N.C. 482; Wolfe v. Pearson, 114 N.C.…