From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Porras

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Sep 9, 2014
NO. 33,600 (N.M. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 33,600

09-09-2014

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANIEL LEAL PORRAS Defendant-Appellant.

Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jesse R. Cosby Roswell, NM for Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY
Charles Cruse Currier, District Judge
Gary K. King, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee Jesse R. Cosby
Roswell, NM
for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
/s/ _________
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Porras

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Sep 9, 2014
NO. 33,600 (N.M. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Porras

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANIEL LEAL PORRAS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Sep 9, 2014

Citations

NO. 33,600 (N.M. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2014)