From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hardwick

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 23, 1994
871 P.2d 506 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

M92-1170; CA A79380

Argued and submitted February 4, 1994.

Convictions affirmed and order of restitution vacated March 23, 1994.

Appeal from District Court, Union County, Eric W. Valentine, Judge.

Stephen P. Riedlinger argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant

Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; order of restitution vacated.


Defendant and his wife both pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. ORS 164.245. After a joint sentencing hearing, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant and his wife on probation. It also ordered that defendant and his wife were jointly and severally liable to pay $2,000 in restitution to the victim. That sentence exceeded the maximum allowable by law, because the state failed to present any evidence that the victim suffered pecuniary damages. State v. Hardwick (A79379), 127 Or. App. 132, 871 P.2d 505 (1994).

Conviction affirmed; order of restitution vacated.


Summaries of

State v. Hardwick

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 23, 1994
871 P.2d 506 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Hardwick

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TODD HARDWICK, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 23, 1994

Citations

871 P.2d 506 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
871 P.2d 506

Citing Cases

State v. Hardwick

He appeals on the same grounds. State v. Hardwick (A79380), 127 Or. App. 134, 871 P.2d 506 (1994). Because…